Posts Tagged ‘Cybersquatting’
Cybersquatting & Consumer Protection: Ensuring Domain Name Integrity: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate
Thursday, June 10th, 2010The Differences Between Domaining And Cybersquatting
Monday, May 3rd, 2010Domainers get bad press. If you do a general search, you can read about the countless complaints that companies have filed against domainers for trademark violations. This is a serious problem within the industry and there are many malicious people out there who don’t think twice about infringing upon a company’s trademark.
When I first began domaining, I was very naive to this problem. Even worse, I didn’t have an appreciation for how many terms that I thought were generic were actually trademarked. The first and only time I had a complaint sent to me about a violation was when I registered a domain name that contained the term “realtor”. I honestly thought the term was just a generic word used by real estate professionals. After owning the domain for approximately a month I was contacted by a representative from the National Association of Realtors. I was told that I couldn’t legally develop the website. In response, I quickly turned the domain back over to the registrar. Why? Because I had obviously purchased something that I wasn’t entitled to.
After that incident, I learned that research is important. I also began to realize the extent of this trademark infringement problem in the domaining world. If you do a simple search of the domains for sale at eBay, for example, you’ll probably find that 10-20% of the names sold on any given day are clearly infringing upon trademarks of companies. I think many domainers register these names for quick resells to unsuspecting end users. I assume people buy these names because they think they can ride the coattails of the larger company so to speak. They are looking for easy traffic for their developed website. The problem for these end users is they can never win. Many cybersquatters have had to pay thousands of dollars in fines for infringing upon a person or company’s trademark. It simply isn’t worth it. Here is a list of the latest infringement cases:
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/casesx/list.jsp?prefix=D&year=2009&seq_min=1&seq_max=199
Real domaining is about speculation. It is a speculative game, just like real estate and stock investing. I buy names at a certain price, I market them as best I can, and then I hope to sell them for a profit. What is hurting the image of domaining are participants in the marketplace that are completely devoid of any business ethics. Ethics is important to help maintain a set of acceptable business practices. By purposely registering domains that contain trademarks, these cybersquatters have brought down a lot of heat on the domaining business. I honestly don’t know what the solution to this problem is. However, we can all start to help by defending the industry. Domainers are not cybersquatters. Domainers don’t knowingly purchase trademarked domain names. If we all make a better effort to be more professional in our business dealings, we may improve the image of domaining. All it usually takes is a simple google search to find if a term is trademarked.
In “cybersquatting” case involving internet domain names, First Circuit holds that U.S.’s Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act grants federal courts … An article from: International Law Update
Saturday, March 6th, 2010Product Description
This digital document is an article from International Law Update, published by Transnational Law Associates on January 1, 2002. The length of the article is 938 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Citation Details
Title: In “cybersq… More >>
Study Suggests New gTLD Cybersquatting, Defensive Registrations Overestimated
Friday, March 5th, 2010Study Suggests New gTLD Cybersquatting, Defensive Registrations Overestimated
According to recent study conducted by Minds + Machines, historical data analysis suggests brand owners do not necessarily register their brands when it comes to new generic Top-Level Domains.
Read more on CircleID
Internet domain name-grabbing, or cyber-squatting: an analysis of remedies under federal law.: An article from: Florida Bar Journal
Sunday, February 21st, 2010Product Description
This digital document is an article from Florida Bar Journal, published by Florida Bar on February 1, 1997. The length of the article is 4731 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Citation Details
Title: Internet domain name-grabbing, … More >>
Cybersquatting Arbitration: Restoring Domain Name Urls
Friday, February 19th, 2010
After you have filed a UDRP complaint under ICANN and a panel has ordered a transfer of the stolen domain name, you may think that your work is finished. However, rarely does everything automatically fall into place and, more often than not, there is still work that needs to be done.
Under the domain name dispute policy, more specifically UDRP Policy Paragraph 4(K), it states that the registrar is required to implement the Panel’s decision 10 (ten) business days after it receives notification of the decision from the dispute resolution service provider, except if the registrar receives information from the domain name registrant (Respondent) in that 10-day period that it is challenging.
Here are some steps cybersquatting lawyers use to ensure that the stolen domain name is transferred back to you:
* Establish an account for the domain name
* Ensure the registrar updates the domain name servers (DNS)
* Ensure the registrar provides you with an Authorization Code so that you can initiate the transfer of the registrar and modify the contact information
* Initiate a request for the transfer of registrar using the Authorization Code
o Note: most registrars have an automated process that requires confirmation from the Admin-C contact on the account.
* Ensure the registrar updates the WHOIS database for the domain name to include your information for the Admin/Technical/Billing contact.
There are many things that can be done if you find yourself a victim of domain name theft, and emerging victorious from a cybersquatting case is key. However, simply winning the arbitration is oftentimes not enough to ensure that your domain name is transferred back to you. If you want to ensure that your domain name transfer process goes smoothly once you have finished the arbitration it may require experienced cybersquatting lawyers to get the domain name back for you. This involves working with your IT person and the registrar, both new and old, to ensure the cybersquatting Panel’s decision is implemented.